🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."