🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly felt the pressure of her father’s legacy. As the daughter of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the most famous UK composers of the early 20th century, Avril’s identity was cloaked in the long shadows of history.

The First Recording

In recent months, I sat with these shadows as I prepared to make the first-ever recording of Avril’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. Featuring emotional harmonies, expressive melodies, and confident beats, her composition will offer audiences valuable perspective into how this artist – an artist in conflict born in 1903 – envisioned her world as a woman of colour.

Legacy and Reality

However about legacies. One needs patience to acclimate, to see shapes as they truly exist, to separate fact from misrepresentation, and I had been afraid to face the composer’s background for some time.

I earnestly desired Avril to be following in her father’s footsteps. Partially, that held. The pastoral English palettes of her father’s impact can be detected in several pieces, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only look at the headings of her parent’s works to understand how he identified as both a champion of English Romanticism and also a advocate of the Black diaspora.

It was here that father and daughter began to differ.

American society judged Samuel by the brilliance of his compositions as opposed to the his ethnicity.

Family Background

During his studies at the prestigious music college, her father – the offspring of a Sierra Leonean father and a British mother – started to lean into his heritage. When the African American poet Paul Laurence Dunbar arrived in England in 1897, the 21-year-old composer was keen to meet him. He set Dunbar’s African Romances to music and the next year adapted his verses for a musical work, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral work that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an worldwide sensation, especially with the Black community who felt shared pride as white America judged Samuel by the brilliance of his music instead of the his race.

Principles and Actions

Recognition did not temper his beliefs. In 1900, he attended the First Pan African Conference in England where he met the prominent scholar this influential figure and saw a series of speeches, such as the mistreatment of the Black community there. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders including the scholar and the educator Washington, delivered his own speeches on racial equality, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with the American leader on a trip to the White House in 1904. Regarding his compositions, Du Bois recalled, “he wrote his name so high as a composer that it will long be remembered.” He passed away in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. Yet how might Samuel have reacted to his offspring’s move to work in the African nation in the mid-20th century?

Conflict and Policy

“Daughter of Famous Composer gives OK to South African policy,” ran a headline in the African American magazine Jet magazine. This policy “appeared to me the appropriate course”, Avril told Jet. Upon further questioning, she backtracked: she was not in favor with the system “in principle” and it “should be allowed to work itself out, directed by well-meaning people of every background”. If Avril had been more in tune to her father’s politics, or raised in segregated America, she may have reconsidered about the policy. Yet her life had sheltered her.

Identity and Naivety

“I have a British passport,” she stated, “and the government agents failed to question me about my background.” So, with her “porcelain-white” skin (as Jet put it), she moved among the Europeans, supported by their acclaim for her renowned family member. She gave a talk about her parent’s compositions at the educational institution and conducted the national orchestra in that location, featuring the bold final section of her composition, named: “In memory of my Father.” While a skilled pianist herself, she did not perform as the featured artist in her work. Rather, she consistently conducted as the conductor; and so the orchestra of the era performed under her direction.

The composer aspired, as she stated, she “could introduce a shift”. But by 1954, circumstances deteriorated. Once officials learned of her African heritage, she was forced to leave the nation. Her citizenship didn’t protect her, the UK representative advised her to leave or risk imprisonment. She returned to England, feeling great shame as the extent of her naivety dawned. “The realization was a painful one,” she expressed. Adding to her disgrace was the 1955 publication of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from that nation.

A Recurring Theme

While I reflected with these shadows, I sensed a known narrative. The story of identifying as British until it’s challenged – that brings to mind troops of color who served for the English during the global conflict and lived only to be denied their due compensation. And the Windrush generation,